So at 20 feet the view width is 24.4 feet or 293 inches. 720p resolution is actually 1,280 pixels so when we divide the pixels by the view width you get 4.3686 pixels per inch. So a face, about 6 inches wide will be 26 pixels across at 20 feet with this cam. 40 is considered to be the min. So even with the best lens focused for 20 feet this is still not going to cut it.
For convenience I worked up the charts below from my compare sheet. Note these charts assume the camera is focused for the target distance and not the upscaled resolution some cams advertise. Despite claims, outdoor fixed focus cams seem to be focused at around 20 to 30 feet. You might get a "decent 2X screen grab" of targets within +- 10 feet of that. Of course for a large range of depth you really should look at a camera with autofocus like the Reolink RLC-411WS I've tried. Though it has had the occasional glitch as well. For long distance something adjustable like the Microseven 6-22mm 3MP Manual Zoom Varifocal Len HD 1080P. Or to get an idea of what you might be able to see with a certain model in your location try IPVM calculator which lest you stick a cam on a map of your property to see what the view angle looks like and has simulated day and night shots at the distance you give.
Not those are best case numbers under perfect conditions. While 7 pixels per inch is bare min 14 is the more accepted min. If I change the wanted pixels per inch to 14 the last chart becomes
Note 12 degrees is a fairly extreme telephoto lens in the range of 22mm
70 is standard though up to 90
between 90 and 130 is often called wide angle
180 to 360 are often called 360 view cameras
For a visual compare here I am about 33 feet from the cameras.
First an old Foscam FI9804PS 720p and 70 degree view angle
Now compare that with a Reolink RLC-511-5MP with auto focus but zoommed to widest view of about 90 degrees.
We can obviously see a lot more and it looks clearer. Just for comparison here is the view from a 1080p M7B77-WPSV1 at max zoom to a view of about 12 degrees located about 190 feet way.
The main diff appears to be the angle .
Now crop the images down to just me and the cart and make them the same size for a recognition compare. Note the sizing is done by the browser. You might interpret a bit more with a smart resize.
|The Foscam image cropped|
|The Reolink image cropped|
|Lastly the Microseven image cropped.|
First here is the Foscam from the Wyze compare test. I'm a bit further out in this one about 60 feet from the cams. You can see the zoomed Reolink image behind it. Note images were resized to match width of widest image (the Roelink).
Here is the save shot form the Wyzecam V2
And the uncovered Reolink zoomed to its max of 31 degrees horizontal.
|Note the glitch in the pic turned out to be a config Blue Iris issue. Inspect sets it to be a generic RTSP and you want to set it as a Reolink.|
In case you are wondering here are some shot with me much closer.
|Foscam shot of me at the parcel box|
|Wyzecam V2 shot of me at the parcel box|
One last distance compare back down the drive about 85 feet from the cams. Between the Microseven still zoomed the max.
And an Amcrest 4K IP8M-2496EB with about 112 degree view angle.
For those that think you can just zoom in, here is what you see if you zoom in to match the Microseven.
But there is one more factor to consider, focus. Autofocus can add a lot though when it gets it wrong it can make your cam useless too. Here is a close up shot with the Foscam where I'm just 7 feet away. The cart maybe double that.
|Note the plate looks good but the logo on my cap is blurry. I'm too close for the range this cam is set too.|
|Notice both my face and the plate are in focus because the camera has adjusted.|